Skip to content
The BMJ
  • Latest
  • Authors
    • Columnists
    • Guest writers
    • Editors at large
    • A to Z
  • Topics
    • NHS
    • US healthcare
    • South Asia
    • China
    • Patient and public perspectives
    • More …

Access thebmj.com - The BMJ logo

Iain Chalmers

Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers: Funders and regulators are more important than journals in fixing the waste in research

September 6, 2017

Funders and regulators have the principal power to implement most of the solutions needed to reduce research waste […]

More…

Iain Chalmers, Paul Glasziou2 Comments

Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers: Can it really be true that 50% of research is unpublished?

June 5, 2017

Whatever the precise non-publication rate is, it is a serious waste of the roughly $180 billion annually invested in health and medical research globally […]

More…

Iain Chalmers, Paul Glasziou8 Comments

Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers: Ill informed replications will increase our avoidable waste of research

March 20, 2017

How does the replicability crisis relate to the estimated 85% waste in medical research? […]

More…

Iain Chalmers, Open data, Paul Glasziou1 Comment

Iain Chalmers: Should the Cochrane logo be accompanied by a health warning?

October 18, 2016

The birth of the Cochrane logo Twenty four summers ago I asked David Mostyn to design a logo to illustrate the objectives of the soon-to-be-opened Cochrane Centre. He did a […]

More…

Guest writers, Iain Chalmers0 Comments

Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers: Is 85% of health research really “wasted”?

January 14, 2016

Our estimate that 85% of all health research is being avoidably “wasted” [Chalmers & Glasziou, 2009] commonly elicits disbelief. Our own first reaction was similar: “that can’t be right?” Not […]

More…

Guest writers, Iain Chalmers, Paul Glasziou7 Comments

Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers: How systematic reviews can reduce waste in research

October 29, 2015

If you asked a member of the public “Should researchers review relevant, existing research systematically before embarking on further research?” they would probably be puzzled. Why would you ask a […]

More…

Iain Chalmers, Paul Glasziou1 Comment

Comment and opinion from The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors

Access bmj.com
The BMJ logo

Most Read

  • Jeffrey Aronson: When I use a word . . . Fingerprints
  • Paul Garner: on his recovery from long covid
  • Time to assume that health research is fraudulent…

Categories

  • Author's perspective
  • BMJ Clinical Evidence
  • Brexit
  • China
  • Christmas appeal
  • Climate change
  • Columnists
    • Abraar Karan
    • Andy Cowper
    • Billy Boland
    • Charlotte Squires
    • Chris Ham
    • Daniel Sokol
    • David Kerr
    • David Lock
    • David Oliver
    • Desmond O'Neill
    • Douglas Noble
    • Edzard Ernst
    • From the other side
    • Gerd Gigerenzer
    • Giles Maskell
    • Harlan Krumholz
    • Hilda Bastian
    • Iain Chalmers
    • James Raftery's NICE blogs
    • Jeff Aronson's Words
    • Jim Murray
    • Julian Sheather
    • Julie K Silver
    • Kieran Walsh
    • Liz Wager
    • Margaret McCartney
    • Marge Berer
    • Martin McKee
    • Martin McShane
    • Mary E Black
    • Mary Higgins
    • Matt Morgan
    • Metaphor watch
    • Muir Gray
    • Neal Maskrey
    • Neena Modi
    • Nick Hopkinson
    • Paul Glasziou
    • Penny Campling
    • Peter Brindley
    • Pritpal S Tamber
    • Rachel Clarke
    • Richard Lehman
    • Richard Smith
    • Sandra Lako
    • Sharon Roman
    • Sian Griffiths
    • Siddhartha Yadav
    • Simon Chapman
    • Tara Lamont
    • Tiago Villanueva
    • Tom Jefferson
    • Tracey Koehlmoos
    • William Cayley
  • Covid-19 known unknowns webinars
  • Editors at large
    • Anita Jain
    • Anya de Iongh
    • Birte Twisselmann
    • Carl Heneghan
    • David Payne
    • Domhnall MacAuley
    • Elizabeth Loder
    • Fiona Godlee
    • Georg Röggla
    • Juliet Dobson
    • Paul Simpson
    • Peter Doshi
    • Readers' editor
    • Robin Baddeley
    • Sally Carter
    • Tessa Richards
    • The BMJ today
  • Featured
  • From the archive
  • Global health
    • Global health disruptors
  • Guest writers
    • The King's fund
  • Junior doctors
  • Literature and medicine
  • Medical ethics
  • MSF
  • NHS
  • Open data
  • Partnership in practice
  • Patient and public perspectives
  • People's covid inquiry
  • Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals
  • South Asia
  • Students
  • Too much medicine
  • Uncategorized
  • Unreported trial of the week
  • US healthcare
  • Weekly review of medical journals
  • Wellbeing

BMJ CAREERS

Information for Authors

BMJ Opinion provides comment and opinion written by The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors.

We welcome submissions for consideration. Your article should be clear, compelling, and appeal to our international readership of doctors and other health professionals. The best pieces make a single topical point. They are well argued with new insights.

For more information on how to submit, please see our instructions for authors.

  • Contact us
  • Website terms & conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Revenue sources
  • Home
  • Top

© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2025. All rights reserved.